Boomer’s Blog

Americans are clearly divided on whether homeowners with distressed properties should receive government-targeted aid to help them keep their houses, as are their elected representatives in Congress.

According to a recent CNNMoney.com poll, only half of Americans surveyed believe that help should be extended to struggling homeowners. These results are derived from phone interviews with 1,008 adults conducted at the end of April. When the same survey was taken in December, 51 percent of survey participants favored special assistance, while 46 percent did not.

The split in popular opinion on the issue also is reflected in the U.S. Congress. Last week, the House of Representatives fiercely debated legislation that would provide federal backing for some at-risk loans and cut the principal owed on some mortgages. The bill passed through the House last week on a 266-154 vote.

The proposed legislation would allow the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) insure up to $300 billion in new loans over four years if lenders agree to reduce mortgage principals. In order to qualify however, lenders would be required to drop the debt to no more than 85 percent of a home’s appraised value. Under the bill, sponsored by House Financial Services Chairman Barney Frank, if the FHA-refinanced loans went into default, the FHA would pay the lender the remaining principal owed.

Critics allege that the legislation is unfair to those who didn’t bite off more debt than their finances could chew, and say it is an inappropriate use of the FHA to bail out lenders and homeowners — all of whom should take responsibility for their business transactions.

Still, due to growing support for the measure in Congress, many expect the legislation to survive bipartisan scrutiny — and predict the bill will gain support from legislators who represent states that have been pummeled by the credit crunch, mortgage meltdown and on-going housing market woes. The White House already has threatened to veto the legislation.