So, it looks like those of us who are following the train wreck on Wall Street are in for another long weekend of ruminations on how our leaders are going to approach fixing this mess. The Fed’s silver bullet du jour likely will be fired from the same gun that built the Resolution Trust Corp. to clean up after the Savings and Loan crisis in the 1980s.
So Far So Good
Since the Wall Street Journal essentially broke the “New RTC on the Horizon” story this morning, stocks soared. The Dow Jones Industrial (DJIA) closed up an optimistic 370 points, and floundering banks and financial institutions displayed signs of life for the first time this week. Deal negotiations among the major players slowed and Wall Street dried its tears and seemed to take its first collective big breath this week. But what impact will all this activity have on battered housing markets?
While the Fed’s efforts to salvage behemoth government sponsored entities (GSEs) Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and stop Wall Street’s bleeding have gone off with some hitches, is looks likely that these moves eventually will serve to slow the foreclosure epidemic, stall depreciation and help stabilize prices. Still, there is no unified, clear message from the Fed regarding a timeline for the housing market’s recovery, despite its nearly $1 trillion pledge to save the economy from further disaster.
Treasury Says Housing Recovery will Take Years ….
Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson said at a press conference this week: “I believe there is a reasonable chance that the biggest part of that housing crisis can be behind us in a number of months. I’m not saying two or three months, but in months as opposed to years. I think we will have housing issues and mortgage issues for years.”
HUD Predicts Housing Recovery Will Take Months ….
U.S. Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Secretary Steven Preston had a totally different take on the housing markets’ recovery this week at a Christian Science Monitor breakfast where he predicted meaningful improvement would occur in “the middle of next year or well into next year.”
Preston also told attendees that, “The crisis will begin abating in a number of regions of the country. That is what I am hopeful of. But I think it will be more intractable in other regions.” He added that recovery would come much slower to the markets hit hardest by the mortgage crisis, including: California, Florida, Arizona, and Nevada.
According to the “State of the Nation’s Housing,” a report from Harvard University’s Joint Center for Housing Studies released earlier this year, other states hard-pressed for recovery are likely to include states in the “rust belt” and much of New England’s industrial areas, where massive job losses had fueled housing market decline. (To access video of Preston’s speech, follow this link.)
Lehman Brothers’ and the BK Whopper
There was a great deal of discussion this week about the Fed’s decision to let Lehman, a 158 year-old brokerage, collapse into bankruptcy Monday. Over the weekend, Wall Street and the Fed worked, yet failed to devise a plan for an 11th-hour intervention to salvage Lehman, but in the end, it looks like it was cheaper to let Lehman die without benefit of a government bailout.
Analysts attribute this apparent display of “tough love” by the Fed to the massive amounts of bad sub-prime mortgage debt exposure Lehman took on through its involvement with Aurora Loan Services and BNC Mortgage. Many say that Lehman just couldn’t be saved.
Tuesday, despite objections (Bloomberg does a great job covering the controversy in this article. ) from some of Lehmans’ creditors, bondholders and others who thought there had not been adequate time for competitors to submit bids, British bank Barclays gobbled up Lehman’s investment banking and capital markets businesses for $250 million in cash. It also paid $1.5 billion for Lehman’s New York headquarters and two New Jersey data facilities.
This handy timeline of Lehman’s decline does more to put this deal in perspective than most anything else in the news this week.
AIG’s Divine Intervention: Maybe not so Divine for Shareholders
Also suffering from post-traumatic subprime mortgage exposure, mega-insurer AIG got a pardon from the governor this week in the form of an $85 billion bridge loan from the Fed.
Analysts are saying that this “divine intervention” was for the “greater good” because of AIG’s role in the DJIA and ties to multiple mutual funds. Still, the announcement came down Thursday that AIG would be nixed from the DJIA and replaced by Kraft Foods. Hey, everybody’s gotta eat, right?
The quote of the week foes to former AIG CEO Hank Greenberg, who, prior to his “retirement” a few years ago, built this giant and achieved greatness well before the sub-prime mortgage virus infected Wall Street’s soft tissues.
Greenberg, who lost billions this week after several unrequited attempts to save AIG from an uncertain fate, pointed out on Fox news that, “No one seemed to be minding the store from a risk management point of view.”
Amid the fallout from AIG’s failures, Greenberg, the insurer’s majority stockholder, is admittedly frustrated, angry and bitter this week. If you just read one article about AIG, make it this story about Greenberg’s attempts to intervene in AIG’s destiny before a federal takeover was in the picture.
Bank of America’s Costly Courtship of Merrill Lynch
In on the weekend’s Lehman negotiations, Merrill Lynch was poised to save itself when Lehman took its final gasp. Come Monday, it seems that Merrill Lynch scrambled to make a whopping $29 per share deal with Bank of America (BofA) to save itself from extinction.
Had BofA waited just one day, it probably could have those tainted shares as low as $10 per. At this point, I think it’s safe to say that we al can expect some flack from BofA shareholders for what seems like a total fumble at this point in the game.
Since acquiring the skeletons in Countrywide’s subprime debt closet earlier this year, no one can say that cash-rich BofA didn’t know what it was getting into. Rumor has it that BofA also is among those currently courting Wachovia, who, despite its problems, still has less extreme sub-prime mortgage exposure than Merrill or Countrywide.
Will WaMu Get a Date to the Prom?
WaMu hired Goldman Sachs this week to find it a suitor – fast. That was before the Fed announced that a plan to save the economy vis-à-vis a new RTC is on the horizon.
Though Goldman is negotiating WaMu’s sale, no single buyer has emerged on the top of the heap this week, but there is widespread speculation that Citigroup may have found enough cash in the corporate sofa to buy the ailing Seattle thrift whose rating was downgraded this week to “junk” status by the major rating agencies.
Other interested parties include Banco Santander SA, of Spain, and Wells Fargo. According to the Portland Business Journal, HSBC and even J.P. Morgan Chase, who made a play for WaMu earlier this year and lost, also are considering bids. If none of these work out, maybe they should try Ebay.
Wachovia and Morgan Struggle to Define Roles and Relationships
It seems more likely than ever that Wachovia could acquire Morgan Stanley. Morgan has had a rough go of it lately. Even after releasing relatively healthy financials, shares plummeted 32 percent this week. Morgan blamed the naked short sellers for the decline.
Wachovia values dropped about 20 percent this week before ralso egaining some footing upon the Fed’s announcement that an RTC-inspired solution to Wall Street’s woes is in the works.
Are the Bailouts Constitutional?
I’ve heard some powerful arguments that the arbitrary nature of some of these bailouts, or takeovers of once-solid Wall Street institutions raises some grave Constitutional issues that are likely to be challenged at some point down the line.
Citing the U.S. Constitution, some observers of the Fed’s bold moves say that by favoring one debtor over another, for example, by allowing Lehman to fail, and then coughing up an $85 billion bridge loan for AIG, the Federal government is exceeding it’s powers.
Critics say that public money is supposed to be used to protect us, to build public-access roads, libraries, etc. By exposing taxpayers to Wall Street’s idiotic bad-risk debt portfolios, the Fed is, in effect, favoring outfits such as AIG over the majority of U.S. citizens and failing to provide for the “general welfare” of the people.
Will the Fed’s RTC-Inspired Plan Save Wall Street or Spread False Confidence?
Clearly the markets picked up today on the Fed’s announcement that an RTC-style fix is in the works. Is this strategy going to be much more than a drawn-out, massive controlled bailout? Is providing these players with a taxpayer-funded repository for its bad paper the real best answer to this widespread problem?
For many onlookers, including, ironically enough, former Fed chief Alan Greenspan, the bailouts present a “moral hazard” by promoting the notion that as long as you’re “too big to fail” or can meet the Fed’s seemingly arbitrary standards for being worthy of saving, you can make whatever foolhardy decisions you want in running your business and still be compensated generously for your efforts. I don’t know about you, but if I run my business that way, I’m sunk.
Eventually, we can anticipate that the recipients of the bailout loans to have default problems of their own. Of course, taxpayers can look forward to covering the litigation costs. We also can expect lawsuits from shareholders who’ve been shafted in these deals.
Who Stole the “Free” from “Free Market Economy”?
We’re looking well over a million more foreclosures this year than last. I think many of us are wondering just where, and by whom, the line will be drawn as to which Wall Street entities are “Too Big to Fail,” what that says about the government’s role in business and how much the taxpayers can be expected to pay.
Heavy implications for Taxpayers and the Nation
I’ve seen rough estimates that the bailouts, takeovers and creation of an RTC-like entity to dispose of Wall Street’s bad paper waste could cost individual taxpayers more than $7,500. As a business owner and taxpayermyself, I find this outrageous. I am appalled by the recent institutional failures and the apparently broken system that let them happen. Even if they’re “necessary,” we all should be concerned about the high costs, legality and morality of the Fed’s efforts to save Wall Street from the wounds it afflicted upon itself.
And though it may be some time before the architects of this economic catastrophe are truly identified and brought to justice, I am comfortable with calling them “terrorists” because their all-consuming greed, dishonesty and sheer stupidity strikes at the core of the U.S. and global economies with intense and brutal force.